2012 -- H 7916

=======

LC01308

=======

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND

IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY

JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2012

____________

H O U S E R E S O L U T I O N

TO PRESERVE HABEAS CORPUS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES OF THE CITIZENS OF RHODE

ISLAND

     Introduced By: Representatives Gordon, Savage, Hull, Carnevale, and Lally

     Date Introduced: March 07, 2012

     Referred To: House Judiciary

1-1

     WHEREAS, The Congress of the United States passed the National Defense

1-2

Authorization Act, 2011 P.L. 112-81 (“2012 NDAA”) for Fiscal Year 2012 on December 15,

1-3

2011; and

1-4

     WHEREAS, The President of the Unites States of America signed the 2012 NDAA into

1-5

law on December 31, 2011; and

1-6

     WHEREAS, Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA requires the Armed Forces of the United

1-7

States to detain, pending disposition according to the Law of War, any person involved in, or who

1-8

provided substantial support to terrorism or belligerent acts against the United States, and who is

1-9

a member of Al-Qaeda or an, associated force; and

1-10

     WHEREAS, Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA specifically excludes United States

1-11

citizens and lawful resident aliens for conduct occurring within the United States, from its

1-12

mandatory detention provisions; and

1-13

     WHEREAS, Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA purports to authorize, but does not require,

1-14

the President of the United States to utilize the Armed Forces of the United States to detain

1-15

persons the President suspects were part of, or substantially supported, Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or

1-16

associated forces; and

1-17

     WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA purports to authorize, but does not require,

1-18

the President of the United States through the Armed Forces of the United States, to dispose of

1-19

such detained persons according to the Law of War, which may include, but is not limited to: (1)

1-20

indefinite detention without charge or trial until the end of hostilities authorized by the 2001

2-1

Authorization for use of Military Force Against Terrorists, 2001 P.L. 107-40; (2) prosecution

2-2

through a Military Commission; or (3) transfer to a foreign country or foreign entity; and

2-3

     WHEREAS, Unlike Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA, Section 1021 makes no specific

2-4

exclusion for United States citizens and lawful resident aliens for conduct occurring within the

2-5

United States; and

2-6

     WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA seeks to preserve existing law and

2-7

authorities pertaining to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the

2-8

United States, and any other person captured in the United States, but does not specify what such

2-9

existing law or authorities are; and

2-10

     WHEREAS, The specific exclusion of application to United States citizens and lawful

2-11

resident aliens contained in Section 1022 of the 2012 NDAA, and the absence of such exclusion

2-12

in Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA, strongly implies that the provisions of Section 1021 are

2-13

intended to apply to United States citizens and lawful resident aliens, whether or not they are

2-14

captured in the United States; and

2-15

     WHEREAS, The Office of the President of the United States, under both the

2-16

administrations of George W. Bush and Barack H. Obama, has asserted the 2001 Authorization

2-17

for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President to indefinitely

2-18

detain without charge, United States citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in the United

2-19

States; and

2-20

     WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has not decided whether the 2001

2-21

Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists allows the Office of the President

2-22

to indefinitely detain without charge, United States citizens and lawful resident aliens captured in

2-23

the United States; and

2-24

     WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA purports to enlarge the scope of those

2-25

persons the Office of the President may indefinitely detain beyond those responsible for the

2-26

September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and those who harbored them, as purportedly authorized by

2-27

the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Terrorists, to now include a person

2-28

who was a part of, or substantially supported Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are

2-29

engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who

2-30

has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy

2-31

forces; and

2-32

     WHEREAS, United States Senator Carl Levin declared in colloquy on the floor of the

2-33

United States Senate that the original 2012 NDAA provided that Section 1021 (then Section 1031

2-34

prior to final drafting) specifically would not apply to United States citizens, but that the Office of

3-1

the President of the United States had requested that such restrictions be removed from the 2012

3-2

NDAA; and

3-3

     WHEREAS, During debate in the Senate and before passage of the 2012 NDAA, United

3-4

States Senator Mark Udall introduced an amendment intended to forbid the indefinite detention of

3-5

U.S. citizens, which was rejected by a vote of 38-60; and

3-6

     WHEREAS, United States Senator John McCain and United States Senator Lindsey

3-7

Graham declared in colloquies on the floor of the United States Senate that Section 1021 of the

3-8

2012 NDAA authorized the indefinite detention of United States citizens captured in the United

3-9

States by the Armed Forces of the United States; and

3-10

     WHEREAS, United States Senator Lindsey Graham declared in colloquy on the floor of

3-11

the United States Senate that the United States homeland is now part of “the battlefield”; and

3-12

     WHEREAS, Policing the citizenry of the United States of America by the Armed Forces

3-13

of the United States, as purportedly authorized by the 2012 NDAA, overturns the Posse

3-14

Comitatus doctrine and is repugnant to a free society; and

3-15

     WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as it purports to authorize: 1) Detainment

3-16

of United States citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States without

3-17

charge; 2) Military tribunals for United States citizens and legal resident aliens captured within

3-18

the United States of America; and 3) The transfer of United States citizens and lawful resident

3-19

aliens captured within the United States to foreign jurisdictions, is violative of the following

3-20

rights enshrined in Constitution of the United States of America:

3-21

     Article I Section 9, Clause 2’s right to seek Writ of Habeas Corpus;

3-22

     The First Amendment’s right to petition the Government for a redress of

3-23

grievances;

3-24

     The Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and

3-25

seizures;

3-26

     The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from charge for an infamous or capital

3-27

crime until presentment or indictment by a grand jury;

3-28

     The Fifth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or

3-29

property, without Due Process of law;

3-30

     The Sixth Amendment’s right in criminal prosecutions to enjoy a speedy trial by

3-31

an impartial jury in the State and District where the crime shall have been

3-32

committed;

3-33

     The Sixth Amendment’s right to be informed of the nature and cause of the

3-34

accusation;

4-1

     The Sixth Amendment’s right to confront witnesses;

4-2

     The Sixth Amendment’s right to Counsel;

4-3

     The Eighth Amendment’s right to be free from excessive bail and fines, and cruel

4-4

and unusual punishment;

4-5

     The Fourteenth Amendment’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or

4-6

property, without due process of law; and

4-7

     WHEREAS, Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA as it purports to authorize; 1) Detainment

4-8

of United States citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States without

4-9

charge; 2) Military tribunals for United States citizens and legal resident aliens captured within

4-10

the United States of America, and 3) the transfer of United States citizens and lawful resident

4-11

aliens captured within the United States to foreign jurisdictions, is repugnant to the following

4-12

rights enshrined in the Rhode Island Constitution;

4-13

     Article 1 Section 2’s right to be free from deprivation of life, liberty, or property,

4-14

without due process of law;

4-15

     Article 1 Section 5’s right to have prompt recourse to the laws for all injuries to

4-16

one’s person;

4-17

     Article 1 Section 6’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure;

4-18

     Article 1 Section 7’s right to be free from capital charge absent a grand jury

4-19

indictment, or felony charge absent grand jury indictment absent information

4-20

signed by the Attorney General;

4-21

     Article 1 Section 8’s right to be free from excessive bail;

4-22

     Article 1 Section 9’s right to bail and right to Habeas Corpus;

4-23

     Article 1 Section 10’s right to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury, right to

4-24

have assistance of counsel, and the right to be free from deprivation of life,

4-25

liberty, or property, unless by the judgment of peers;

4-26

     Article 1 Section 14’s right to be presumed innocent until pronounced guilty by

4-27

the law;

4-28

     Article 1 Section 15’s right to a trial by Jury;

4-29

     Article 1 Section 18’s requirement that the military authority is subordinate to the

4-30

civil authority;

4-31

     WHEREAS, The members of this House of Representatives have taken an oath to uphold

4-32

the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of Rhode Island

4-33

and Providence Plantations; and

5-34

     WHEREAS, This House of Representatives opposes any and all rules, laws, regulations,

5-35

bill language, or executive orders, which amount to an overreach of the federal government and

5-36

which effectively take away civil liberties; and

5-37

     WHEREAS, It is indisputable that the threat of terrorism is real, and that the full force of

5-38

appropriate and constitutional law must be used to defeat this threat; however, winning the war

5-39

against terror cannot come at the great expense of mitigating basic, fundamental, constitutional

5-40

rights; and

5-41

     WHEREAS, Undermining our own Constitutional rights serves only to concede to the

5-42

terrorists’ demands of changing the fabric of what made the United States of America a country

5-43

of freedom, liberty, and opportunity; now, therefore be it

5-44

     RESOLVED, That this House of Representatives of the State of Rhode Island and

5-45

Providence Plantations hereby condemns in no uncertain terms Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA

5-46

as it purports to: 1) Repeal Posse Comitatus and authorize the President of the United States to

5-47

utilize the Armed Forces of the United States to police United States citizens and lawful resident

5-48

aliens within the United States of America; 2) Indefinitely detain United States citizens and

5-49

lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America without charge until the end

5-50

of hostilities authorized by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force; 3) Subject

5-51

American Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within the United States of America to

5-52

military tribunals; and 4) Transfer American Citizens and lawful resident aliens captured within

5-53

the United States of America to a foreign country or foreign entity; and be it further

5-54

     RESOLVED, That this House of Representatives of the State of Rhode Island and

5-55

Providence Plantations hereby finds that the enactment into law by the United States Congress of

5-56

Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, Public Law Number

5-57

112-81, is inimical to the liberty, security, and well-being of the people of Rhode Island, and was

5-58

adopted by the United States Congress in violation of the limits of federal power in United States

5-59

Constitution; and be it further

5-60

     RESOLVED, That the Secretary of State be and he hereby is authorized and directed to

5-61

transmit duly certified copies of this resolution to the Honorable Barack Obama, President of the

5-62

United States; the Senate Majority Leader; the Speaker of the House of Representatives, each

5-63

member of Congress from the State of Rhode Island; the Honorable John Roberts, Chief Justice

5-64

of the United States Supreme Court; each Associate Justice of the United States; and the

5-66

President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives of each state’s

6-1

legislature.

=======

LC01308

=======