2012 -- H 8024 | |
======= | |
LC02179 | |
======= | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
| |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
| |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2012 | |
| |
____________ | |
| |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- ADMINISTRATIVE | |
PROCEDURES | |
|
      |
|
      |
     Introduced By: Representatives Serpa, Morgan, Trillo, Ferri, and Keable | |
     Date Introduced: March 29, 2012 | |
     Referred To: House Small Business | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
1-1 |
     SECTION 1. Sections 42-35.1-3 and 42-35.1-4 of the General Laws in Chapter 42-35.1 |
1-2 |
entitled "Small Business Regulatory Fairness in Administrative Procedures" are hereby amended |
1-3 |
to read as follows: |
1-4 |
     42-35.1-3. Economic Impact statements. -- (a) Prior to the continued enforcement of |
1-5 |
any regulation or the adoption of any proposed regulation that may have an adverse impact on |
1-6 |
small businesses, excluding those businesses defined in subsection 42-35-3.3(d), |
1-7 |
economic development corporation shall prepare, in congruence with the analysis required in |
1-8 |
section 42-35-3.3, an economic impact statements that includes the following: |
1-9 |
      (1) An identification and estimate of the number of the small businesses subject to the |
1-10 |
existing or proposed regulation; |
1-11 |
      (2) The projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other administrative costs required for |
1-12 |
compliance with the existing or proposed regulation, including the type of professional skills |
1-13 |
necessary for preparation of the report or record; |
1-14 |
      (3) A statement of the effect or probable effect on impacted small businesses; |
1-15 |
      (4) A description of any less intrusive or less costly alternative methods of achieving the |
1-16 |
purpose of the existing or proposed regulation. |
1-17 |
      (b) The economic impact statement required herein shall be published in guide form as |
1-18 |
well as posted on the department of administration and the |
1-19 |
websites. The guide should be published and/or posted on or around the same date as the |
2-1 |
regulation change and shall include a description of actions need by the small business to meet |
2-2 |
the requirement of the regulation. |
2-3 |
     42-35.1-4. Regulatory flexibility -- Flexibility analysis required. -- (a) |
2-4 |
Notwithstanding any general or public law to the contrary, prior to the adoption of any proposed |
2-5 |
regulation on and after January 1, 2010, |
2-6 |
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis in which the |
2-7 |
shall, where consistent with health, safety, environmental, and economic welfare consider |
2-8 |
utilizing regulatory methods that will accomplish the objectives of applicable statutes while |
2-9 |
minimizing adverse impact on small businesses. The |
2-10 |
shall consider, without limitation, each of the following methods of reducing the impact of the |
2-11 |
proposed regulation on small businesses: |
2-12 |
      (1) The establishment of less stringent compliance or reporting requirements for small |
2-13 |
businesses; |
2-14 |
      (2) The establishment of less stringent schedules or deadlines for compliance or |
2-15 |
reporting requirements for small businesses; |
2-16 |
      (3) The consolidation or simplification of compliance or reporting requirements for small |
2-17 |
businesses; |
2-18 |
      (4) The establishment of performance standards for small businesses to replace design or |
2-19 |
operational standards required in the proposed regulation; and |
2-20 |
      (5) The exemption of small businesses from all or any part of the requirements contained |
2-21 |
in the proposed regulation. |
2-22 |
     (6) The fact that the benefit conferred by the regulation is outweighed by the cost. |
2-23 |
      (b) Prior to the adoption of any proposed regulation that may have an adverse impact on |
2-24 |
small businesses each agency shall notify the economic development corporation of its intent to |
2-25 |
adopt the proposed regulation. The economic development corporation shall advise and assist |
2-26 |
agencies in complying with the provisions of this section. |
2-27 |
     SECTION 2. Chapter 42-35.1 of the General Laws entitled "Small Business Regulatory |
2-28 |
Fairness in Administrative Procedures" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following |
2-29 |
section: |
2-30 |
     42-35.1-4.1. Periodic review of rules. – (a) Within four (4) years of the enactment of |
2-31 |
this law, the economic development corporation shall review all agency rules existing at the time |
2-32 |
of enactment to determine whether such rules should be continued without change, or should be |
2-33 |
amended or rescinded, to minimize economic impact or the cost of the rules on small businesses |
2-34 |
in a manner consistent with the stated objective of applicable statutes. If the head of the economic |
3-1 |
development corporation determines that completion of the review of existing rules is not feasible |
3-2 |
by the established date, the economic development corporation shall publish a statement |
3-3 |
certifying that determination. The economic development corporation may extend the completion |
3-4 |
date by one year at a time for a total of not more than five (5) years. Within ninety (90) days of a |
3-5 |
request made by the economic development corporation, each agency shall submit a list of the |
3-6 |
rules and regulations requested together with any modification or amendments thereto. |
3-7 |
     (b) Rules adopted after the enactment of this law shall be reviewed every five (5) years |
3-8 |
after publication of such rules in final form to ensure that they minimize economic impact on |
3-9 |
small businesses in a manner consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statutes. |
3-10 |
     (c) In reviewing rules to minimize the cost or economic impact of the rule on small |
3-11 |
businesses, the economic development corporation shall consider the following factors: |
3-12 |
     (1) The continued need for the rule; |
3-13 |
     (2) The nature of complaints or comments received concerning the rule from the public; |
3-14 |
     (3) The complexity of the rule; |
3-15 |
     (4) The extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other federal, state, |
3-16 |
and local governmental rules; and |
3-17 |
     (5) The length of time since the rule has been evaluated or the degree to which |
3-18 |
technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. |
3-19 |
     (d) Any agency rule which the economic development corporation determines should not |
3-20 |
be continued without change, or should be amended or rescinded in accordance with subsection |
3-21 |
(a) hereof shall be suspended from continued enforcement unless and until the general assembly |
3-22 |
shall have taken appropriate legislative action to continue the enforcement of such rule. |
3-23 |
     (e) In conducting its review, the economic development corporation shall have access to |
3-24 |
any information possessed by the agency. |
3-25 |
     SECTION 3. This act shall take effect upon passage. |
      | |
======= | |
LC02179 | |
======== | |
EXPLANATION | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
OF | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- ADMINISTRATIVE | |
PROCEDURES | |
*** | |
4-1 |
     This act would require a cost/benefit analysis and periodic review of all regulations |
4-2 |
governing or impacting small businesses. |
4-3 |
     This act would take effect upon passage. |
      | |
======= | |
LC02179 | |
======= |