2013 -- S 0132 | |
======= | |
LC00483 | |
======= | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
| |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
| |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2013 | |
| |
____________ | |
| |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- CORRECTIONAL | |
INSTITUTIONS | |
|
      |
|
      |
     Introduced By: Senator William A. Walaska | |
     Date Introduced: January 24, 2013 | |
     Referred To: Senate Finance | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
1-1 |
     SECTION 1. Title 42 of the General Laws entitled "State Affairs and Government" is |
1-2 |
hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: |
1-3 |
     CHAPTER 56.4 |
1-4 |
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COST REDUCTION |
1-5 |
     42-56.4-1. Legislative findings. -- The legislature finds and declares that states have |
1-6 |
saved millions of dollars by implementing solutions to eliminate and recover correctional |
1-7 |
healthcare overpayments. Similarly, states have significantly reduced correctional healthcare |
1-8 |
costs by billing Medicaid for eligible inpatient healthcare costs. Therefore, it is the intent of the |
1-9 |
legislature to implement automated payment detection, prevention and recovery solutions to |
1-10 |
reduce correctional healthcare overpayments and to assure that Medicaid is billed for eligible |
1-11 |
inpatient hospital and professional services. |
1-12 |
     42-56.4-2. Application. -- Unless otherwise stated, the chapter shall specifically apply to: |
1-13 |
     (1) State correctional healthcare systems and services. |
1-14 |
     (2) State contracted managed correctional healthcare services. |
1-15 |
     42-56.4-3. Clinical code editing technology. -- The state shall implement state-of-the-art |
1-16 |
clinical code editing technology solutions to further automate claims resolution and enhance cost |
1-17 |
containment through improved claim accuracy and appropriate code correction. The technology |
1-18 |
shall indentify and prevent errors or potential overbilling based on widely accepted and |
1-19 |
referenceable protocols such as the American Medical Association and the Centers for Medicare |
2-1 |
and Medicaid Services. The edits shall be applied automatically before claims are adjudicated to |
2-2 |
speed processing and reduce the number of pended or rejected claims and help ensure a smoother, |
2-3 |
more consistent and more open adjudication process and fewer delays in provider reimbursement. |
2-4 |
     42-56.4-4. Healthcare claims auditing. -- The state shall implement correctional |
2-5 |
healthcare claims audit and recovery services to identify improper payments due to non- |
2-6 |
fraudulent issues, audit claims, obtain provider sign-off on the audit results and recover validated |
2-7 |
overpayments. Post payment reviews shall ensure that the diagnosis and procedure codes are |
2-8 |
accurate and valid based on the supporting physician documentation within the medical records. |
2-9 |
Core categories of reviews could include coding compliance diagnosis related group (DRG) |
2-10 |
reviews, transfers readmissions, cost outlier reviews, outpatient seventy-two (72)-hour rule |
2-11 |
reviews, payment errors, billing errors, and others. |
2-12 |
     42-56.4-5. Automated payment detection -- Prevention and recovery services. -- The |
2-13 |
state shall implement automated payment detection, prevention and recovery solutions to assure |
2-14 |
the Medicaid is billed for eligible inpatient hospital and professional services. |
2-15 |
     42-56.4-6. Implementation. -- It is the intent of the legislature that the state shall |
2-16 |
contract for these services and that the savings achieved through this chapter shall more than |
2-17 |
cover the cost of implementation and administration. Therefore, to the extent possible, technology |
2-18 |
services used in carrying out this chapter shall be secured using the savings generated by the |
2-19 |
program, whereby the state’s only direct cost will be funded through the actual savings achieved. |
2-20 |
Further, to enable this model, reimbursement to the contractor may be contracted on the basis of a |
2-21 |
percentage of achieved savings model, a per beneficiary per month model, a per transaction |
2-22 |
model, a case-rate model, or any blended model of the aforementioned methodologies. |
2-23 |
Reimbursement models with the contractor may also include performance guarantees of the |
2-24 |
contractor to ensure savings identified exceeds program costs. |
2-25 |
     SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage. |
      | |
======= | |
LC00483 | |
======= | |
EXPLANATION | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
OF | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- CORRECTIONAL | |
INSTITUTIONS | |
*** | |
3-1 |
     This act would reduce inmate healthcare costs by billing Medicaid for eligible inpatient |
3-2 |
hospitals and professional services. |
3-3 |
     This act would take effect upon passage. |
      | |
======= | |
LC00483 | |
======= |