2013 -- S 0606 | |
======= | |
LC01907 | |
======= | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
| |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
| |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2013 | |
| |
____________ | |
| |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO TAXATION -- LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL TAXES | |
|
      |
|
      |
     Introduced By: Senators P Fogarty, Nesselbush, and Cote | |
     Date Introduced: March 06, 2013 | |
     Referred To: Senate Finance | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
1-1 |
     SECTION 1. Sections 44-5-11.5 and 44-5-11.6 of the General Laws in Chapter 44-5 |
1-2 |
entitled "Levy and Assessment of Local Taxes" are hereby amended to read as follows: |
1-3 |
     44-5-11.5. Legislative findings -- Revaluation cycle. -- It is found and declared that: |
1-4 |
      (1) Rhode Island property taxes continue to play a significant role in the financing of |
1-5 |
local educational and municipal services. The general assembly recognizes that the way the |
1-6 |
property tax is assessed, levied and collected can be improved to provide more reliable and up-to- |
1-7 |
date property values in each of the cities and towns. |
1-8 |
      (2) The state's ten (10) year property revaluation cycle is the longest revaluation cycle in |
1-9 |
the country. Infrequent revaluations translate into disparities in property tax burden between types |
1-10 |
and classes of property within and among cities and towns. In addition, because each city and |
1-11 |
town represents multiple systems and procedures for administering the property tax, there is an |
1-12 |
inconsistent administration of property tax law and regulations. |
1-13 |
      (3) It is the intent of the general assembly to ensure that all taxpayers in Rhode Island are |
1-14 |
treated equitably. The more frequent the revaluation, the greater the equity within and among |
1-15 |
jurisdictions. Ensuring that taxpayers are treated fairly begins with modernizing the |
1-16 |
administration of the property tax that ensures: |
1-17 |
      (i) Up-to-date property values are maintained through more frequent property |
1-18 |
revaluations; |
1-19 |
      (ii) Cities and towns meet defined standards related to performing updates of property |
1-20 |
values; |
2-1 |
      (iii) The state shares in the cost of performing updates of property values in the cities and |
2-2 |
towns; |
2-3 |
      (iv) A meaningful and effective method of ensuring that cities and towns comply with |
2-4 |
the nine (9) year revaluation cycle and the updates of property values are developed; |
2-5 |
      (v) Procedures for administering the property tax are standardized -- such as general |
2-6 |
reporting and classification systems; |
2-7 |
      (vi) Assessors and contracted property revaluation companies meet appropriate |
2-8 |
qualifications and standards; and |
2-9 |
      (vii) Intergovernmental cooperation in the administration of the property tax is |
2-10 |
maximized. |
2-11 |
      (4) With these findings in mind, it is the intent of the general assembly to institute a |
2-12 |
revaluation cycle where every city or town conducts a revaluation within nine (9) years of the |
2-13 |
date of the prior revaluation and shall conduct an update of real property every |
2-14 |
years from the date of the last revaluation. |
2-15 |
     44-5-11.6. Assessment of valuations -- Apportionment of levies. -- (a) Notwithstanding |
2-16 |
the provisions of section 44-5-11 [repealed] beginning on December 31, 2000, the assessors in the |
2-17 |
several towns and cities shall conduct an update as defined in this section or shall assess all |
2-18 |
valuations and apportion the levy of all taxes legally ordered under the rules and regulations, not |
2-19 |
repugnant to law, as the town meetings and city councils, respectively, shall from time to time |
2-20 |
prescribe; provided, that the update or valuation is performed in accordance with the following |
2-21 |
schedules: |
2-22 |
     (1) (i) For a transition period, for cities and towns who conducted or implemented a |
2-23 |
revaluation as of 1993 or in years later: |
2-24 |
      Update Revaluation |
2-25 |
     Lincoln 2000 2003 |
2-26 |
     South Kingstown 2000 2003 |
2-27 |
     Smithfield 2000 2003 |
2-28 |
     West Warwick 2000 2003 |
2-29 |
     Johnston 2000 2003 |
2-30 |
     Burrillville 2000 2003 |
2-31 |
     North Smithfield 2000 2003 |
2-32 |
     Central Falls 2000 2003 |
2-33 |
     North Kingstown 2000 2003 |
3-34 |
     Jamestown 2000 2003 |
3-35 |
     North Providence 2001 2004 |
3-36 |
     Cumberland 2001 2004 |
3-37 |
     Bristol 2004 2001 |
3-38 |
     Charlestown 2001 2004 |
3-39 |
     East Greenwich 2002 2005 |
3-40 |
     Cranston 2002 2005 |
3-41 |
     Barrington 2002 2005 |
3-42 |
     Warwick 2003 2006 |
3-43 |
     Warren 2003 2006 |
3-44 |
     East Providence 2003 2006 |
3-45 |
      (ii) Provided that the reevaluation period for the town of New Shoreham shall be |
3-46 |
extended to 2003 and the update for the town of Hopkinton may be extended to 2007 with no |
3-47 |
additional reimbursements by the state relating to the delay. |
3-48 |
      (iii) The implementation date for this schedule is December 31st, of the stated year. |
3-49 |
      (iv) Those cities and towns not listed in this schedule, shall continue the revaluation |
3-50 |
schedule pursuant to section 44-5-11 [repealed]. |
3-51 |
     (2) (i) For the post transition period and in years thereafter: |
3-52 |
      Update #1 Update #2 Revaluation |
3-53 |
     Woonsocket 2002 2005 2008 |
3-54 |
     Pawtucket 2002 2005 2008 |
3-55 |
     Portsmouth 2001 2004 2007 |
3-56 |
     Coventry 2001 2004 2007 |
3-57 |
     Providence 2003 2006 2009 |
3-58 |
     Foster 2002 2005 2008 |
3-59 |
     Middletown 2002 2005 2008 |
3-60 |
     Little Compton 2003 2006 2009 |
3-61 |
     Scituate 2003 2006 2009 |
3-62 |
     Westerly 2003 2006 2009 |
3-63 |
     West Greenwich 2004 2007 2010 |
3-64 |
     Glocester 2004 2007 2010 |
3-65 |
     Richmond 2004 2007 2010 |
3-66 |
     Bristol 2004 2007 2010 |
3-67 |
     Tiverton 2005 2008 2011 |
4-68 |
     Newport 2005 2008 2011 |
4-69 |
     New Shoreham 2006 2009 2012 |
4-70 |
     Narragansett 2005 2008 2011 |
4-71 |
     Exeter 2005 2008 2011 |
4-72 |
     Hopkinton 2007 2010 2013 |
4-73 |
     Lincoln 2006 2009 2012 |
4-74 |
     South Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 |
4-75 |
     Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 |
4-76 |
     West Warwick 2006 2009 2012 |
4-77 |
     Johnston 2006 2009 2012 |
4-78 |
     Burrillville 2006 2009 2012 |
4-79 |
     North Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 |
4-80 |
     Central Falls 2006 2009 2012 |
4-81 |
     North Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 |
4-82 |
     Jamestown 2006 2009 2012 |
4-83 |
     North Providence 2007 2010 2013 |
4-84 |
     Cumberland 2007 2010 2013 |
4-85 |
     Charlestown 2007 2010 2013 |
4-86 |
     East Greenwich 2008 2011 2014 |
4-87 |
     Cranston 2008 2011 2014 |
4-88 |
     Barrington 2008 2010 2014 |
4-89 |
     Warwick 2009 2012 2015 |
4-90 |
     Warren 2009 2012 2015 |
4-91 |
     East Providence 2009 2012 2015 |
4-92 |
      (ii) The implementation date for the schedule is December 31st of the stated year. Upon |
4-93 |
the completion of the update and revaluation according to this schedule, each city and town shall |
4-94 |
conduct a revaluation within nine (9) years of the date of the prior revaluation and shall conduct |
4-95 |
an update of real property every |
4-96 |
      (b) No later than February 1, 1998, the director of the department of revenue shall |
4-97 |
promulgate rules and regulations consistent with the provisions of this section to define the |
4-98 |
requirements for the updates which shall include, but not be limited to: |
4-99 |
      (1) An analysis of sales; |
4-100 |
      (2) A rebuilding of land value tables; |
4-101 |
      (3) A rebuilding of cost tables of all improvement items; and |
5-102 |
      (4) A rebuilding of depreciation schedules. Upon completion of an update, each city or |
5-103 |
town shall provide for a hearing and/or appeal process for any aggrieved person to address any |
5-104 |
issue, which arose during the update. |
5-105 |
      (c) The costs incurred by the towns and cities for the first update shall be borne by the |
5-106 |
state in an amount not to exceed twenty dollars ($20.00) per parcel. The costs incurred by the |
5-107 |
towns and cities for the second update shall be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state (in an |
5-108 |
amount not to exceed sixteen dollars ($16.00) per parcel) and twenty percent (20%) by the town |
5-109 |
or city and in the third update and thereafter, the state shall pay sixty percent (60%) of the update |
5-110 |
(not to exceed twelve dollars ($12.00) per parcel) and the town or city shall pay forty percent |
5-111 |
(40%); provided, that for the second update and in all updates thereafter, that the costs incurred |
5-112 |
by any city or town which is determined to be a distressed community pursuant to section 45-13- |
5-113 |
12 shall be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state and twenty percent (20%) by the city or town |
5-114 |
for all updates required by this section. |
5-115 |
      (d) The office of municipal affairs, after consultation with the league of cities and towns |
5-116 |
and the Rhode Island assessors' association, shall recommend adjustments to the costs formula |
5-117 |
described in subsection (c) of this section based upon existing market conditions. |
5-118 |
      (e) Any property, which is either exempt from the local property tax pursuant to section |
5-119 |
44-3-3 or which pays a city or town an amount in lieu of taxes, is not required to have its values |
5-120 |
updated pursuant to this section, and the property is not eligible for the reimbursement provisions |
5-121 |
of subsection (c) of this section. However, those properties which are exempt from taxation and |
5-122 |
are eligible for state appropriations in lieu of property tax under the provisions of section 45-13- |
5-123 |
5.1 are eligible for state reimbursement pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, provided, that |
5-124 |
these properties were revalued as part of that city or town's most recent property revaluation. |
5-125 |
      (f) No city or town is required to conduct an update pursuant to this section unless the |
5-126 |
state has appropriated sufficient funds to cover the state's costs as identified in subsection (c) of |
5-127 |
this section. |
5-128 |
      (g) Any city or town that fails to conduct an update or revaluation as required by this |
5-129 |
section, or requests and receives an extension of the dates specified in this section, shall receive |
5-130 |
the same amount of state aid under sections 45-13-1, 45-13-5.1, and 45-13-12 in the budget year |
5-131 |
for which the new values were to apply as the city or town received in-state aid in the previous |
5-132 |
budget year; provided, however, if the new year's entitlement is lower than the prior year's |
5-133 |
entitlement, the lower amount applies, except for the town of New Shoreham for the fiscal year |
5-134 |
2003. |
5-135 |
      (h) Any bill or resolution to extend the dates for a city or town to conduct an update or |
5-136 |
revaluation must be approved by a two-thirds |
6-1 |
assembly. |
6-2 |
     SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage. |
      | |
======= | |
LC01907 | |
======== | |
EXPLANATION | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
OF | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO TAXATION -- LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL TAXES | |
*** | |
7-1 |
     This act would increase from three (3) to six (6) years the interval of time within which a |
7-2 |
city or town must conduct an update of its last real property revaluation. |
7-3 |
     This act would take effect upon passage. |
      | |
======= | |
LC01907 | |
======= |