2014 -- S 2087 | |
======== | |
LC003145 | |
======== | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2014 | |
____________ | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO TAXATION -- LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL TAXES | |
| |
Introduced By: Senators Bates, Hodgson, Pearson, Jabour, and Sosnowski | |
Date Introduced: January 21, 2014 | |
Referred To: Senate Housing & Municipal Government | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
1 | SECTION 1. Sections 44-5-11.5 and 44-5-11.6 of the General Laws in Chapter 44-5 |
2 | entitled "Levy and Assessment of Local Taxes" are hereby amended to read as follows: |
3 | 44-5-11.5. Legislative findings -- Revaluation cycle. -- It is found and declared that: |
4 | (1) Rhode Island property taxes continue to play a significant role in the financing of |
5 | local educational and municipal services. The general assembly recognizes that the way the |
6 | property tax is assessed, levied and collected can be improved to provide more reliable and up-to- |
7 | date property values in each of the cities and towns. |
8 | (2) The state's ten (10) year property revaluation cycle is the longest revaluation cycle in |
9 | the country. Infrequent revaluations translate into disparities in property tax burden between types |
10 | and classes of property within and among cities and towns. In addition, because each city and |
11 | town represents multiple systems and procedures for administering the property tax, there is an |
12 | inconsistent administration of property tax law and regulations. |
13 | (3) It is the intent of the general assembly to ensure that all taxpayers in Rhode Island are |
14 | treated equitably. The more frequent the revaluation, the greater the equity within and among |
15 | jurisdictions. Ensuring that taxpayers are treated fairly begins with modernizing the |
16 | administration of the property tax that ensures: |
17 | (i) Up-to-date property values are maintained through more frequent property |
18 | revaluations; |
19 | (ii) Cities and towns meet defined standards related to performing updates of property |
| |
1 | values; |
2 | (iii) The state shares in the cost of performing updates of property values in the cities and |
3 | towns; |
4 | (iv) A meaningful and effective method of ensuring that cities and towns comply with |
5 | the nine (9) year revaluation cycle and the updates of property values are developed; |
6 | (v) Procedures for administering the property tax are standardized -- such as general |
7 | reporting and classification systems; |
8 | (vi) Assessors and contracted property revaluation companies meet appropriate |
9 | qualifications and standards; and |
10 | (vii) Intergovernmental cooperation in the administration of the property tax is |
11 | maximized. |
12 | (4) With these findings in mind, it is the intent of the general assembly to institute a |
13 | revaluation cycle where every city or town conducts a revaluation within nine (9) years of the |
14 | date of the prior revaluation and shall conduct an update of real property every three (3) five (5) |
15 | years from the date of the last revaluation. |
16 | 44-5-11.6. Assessment of valuations -- Apportionment of levies. -- (a) Notwithstanding |
17 | the provisions of section 44-5-11 [repealed] beginning on December 31, 2000, the assessors in the |
18 | several towns and cities shall conduct an update as defined in this section or shall assess all |
19 | valuations and apportion the levy of all taxes legally ordered under the rules and regulations, not |
20 | repugnant to law, as the town meetings and city councils, respectively, shall from time to time |
21 | prescribe; provided, that the update or valuation is performed in accordance with the following |
22 | schedules: |
23 | (1) (i) For a transition period, for cities and towns who conducted or implemented a |
24 | revaluation as of 1993 or in years later: |
25 | Update Revaluation |
26 | Lincoln 2000 2003 |
27 | South Kingstown 2000 2003 |
28 | Smithfield 2000 2003 |
29 | West Warwick 2000 2003 |
30 | Johnston 2000 2003 |
31 | Burrillville 2000 2003 |
32 | North Smithfield 2000 2003 |
33 | Central Falls 2000 2003 |
34 | North Kingstown 2000 2003 |
| LC003145 - Page 2 of 7 |
1 | Jamestown 2000 2003 |
2 | North Providence 2001 2004 |
3 | Cumberland 2001 2004 |
4 | Bristol 2004 2001 |
5 | Charlestown 2001 2004 |
6 | East Greenwich 2002 2005 |
7 | Cranston 2002 2005 |
8 | Barrington 2002 2005 |
9 | Warwick 2003 2006 |
10 | Warren 2003 2006 |
11 | East Providence 2003 2006 |
12 | (ii) Provided that the reevaluation period for the town of New Shoreham shall be |
13 | extended to 2003 and the update for the town of Hopkinton may be extended to 2007 with no |
14 | additional reimbursements by the state relating to the delay. |
15 | (iii) The implementation date for this schedule is December 31st, of the stated year. |
16 | (iv) Those cities and towns not listed in this schedule, shall continue the revaluation |
17 | schedule pursuant to section 44-5-11 [repealed]. |
18 | (2) (i) For the post transition period and in years thereafter: |
19 | Update #1 Update #2 Revaluation |
20 | Woonsocket 2002 2005 2008 |
21 | Pawtucket 2002 2005 2008 |
22 | Portsmouth 2001 2004 2007 |
23 | Coventry 2001 2004 2007 |
24 | Providence 2003 2006 2009 |
25 | Foster 2002 2005 2008 |
26 | Middletown 2002 2005 2008 |
27 | Little Compton 2003 2006 2009 |
28 | Scituate 2003 2006 2009 |
29 | Westerly 2003 2006 2009 |
30 | West Greenwich 2004 2007 2010 |
31 | Glocester 2004 2007 2010 |
32 | Richmond 2004 2007 2010 |
33 | Bristol 2004 2007 2010 |
34 | Tiverton 2005 2008 2011 |
| LC003145 - Page 3 of 7 |
1 | Newport 2005 2008 2011 |
2 | New Shoreham 2006 2009 2012 |
3 | Narragansett 2005 2008 2011 |
4 | Exeter 2005 2008 2011 |
5 | Hopkinton 2007 2010 2013 |
6 | Lincoln 2006 2009 2012 |
7 | South Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 |
8 | Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 |
9 | West Warwick 2006 2009 2012 |
10 | Johnston 2006 2009 2012 |
11 | Burrillville 2006 2009 2012 |
12 | North Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 |
13 | Central Falls 2006 2009 2012 |
14 | North Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 |
15 | Jamestown 2006 2009 2012 |
16 | North Providence 2007 2010 2013 |
17 | Cumberland 2007 2010 2013 |
18 | Charlestown 2007 2010 2013 |
19 | East Greenwich 2008 2011 2014 |
20 | Cranston 2008 2011 2014 |
21 | Barrington 2008 2010 2014 |
22 | Warwick 2009 2012 2015 |
23 | Warren 2009 2012 2015 |
24 | East Providence 2009 2012 2015 |
25 | (ii) The implementation date for the schedule is December 31st of the stated year. Upon |
26 | the completion of the update and revaluation according to this schedule, each city and town shall |
27 | conduct a revaluation within nine (9) years of the date of the prior revaluation and shall conduct |
28 | an update of real property every three (3) five (5) years from the last revaluation. Provided, |
29 | however, the five (5) year update of real property shall not commence prior to the completion of |
30 | all previously scheduled revaluations as set forth in paragraph (2)(i). |
31 | (b) No later than February 1, 1998, the director of the department of revenue shall |
32 | promulgate rules and regulations consistent with the provisions of this section to define the |
33 | requirements for the updates which shall include, but not be limited to: |
34 | (1) An analysis of sales; |
| LC003145 - Page 4 of 7 |
1 | (2) A rebuilding of land value tables; |
2 | (3) A rebuilding of cost tables of all improvement items; and |
3 | (4) A rebuilding of depreciation schedules. Upon completion of an update, each city or |
4 | town shall provide for a hearing and/or appeal process for any aggrieved person to address any |
5 | issue, which arose during the update. |
6 | (c) The costs incurred by the towns and cities for the first update shall be borne by the |
7 | state in an amount not to exceed twenty dollars ($20.00) per parcel. The costs incurred by the |
8 | towns and cities for the second update shall be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state (in an |
9 | amount not to exceed sixteen dollars ($16.00) per parcel) and twenty percent (20%) by the town |
10 | or city and in the third update and thereafter, the state shall pay sixty percent (60%) of the update |
11 | (not to exceed twelve dollars ($12.00) per parcel) and the town or city shall pay forty percent |
12 | (40%); provided, that for the second update and in all updates thereafter, that the costs incurred |
13 | by any city or town which is determined to be a distressed community pursuant to section 45-13- |
14 | 12 shall be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state and twenty percent (20%) by the city or town |
15 | for all updates required by this section. |
16 | (d) The office of municipal affairs, after consultation with the league of cities and towns |
17 | and the Rhode Island assessors' association, shall recommend adjustments to the costs formula |
18 | described in subsection (c) of this section based upon existing market conditions. |
19 | (e) Any property, which is either exempt from the local property tax pursuant to section |
20 | 44-3-3 or which pays a city or town an amount in lieu of taxes, is not required to have its values |
21 | updated pursuant to this section, and the property is not eligible for the reimbursement provisions |
22 | of subsection (c) of this section. However, those properties which are exempt from taxation and |
23 | are eligible for state appropriations in lieu of property tax under the provisions of section 45-13- |
24 | 5.1 are eligible for state reimbursement pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, provided, that |
25 | these properties were revalued as part of that city or town's most recent property revaluation. |
26 | (f) No city or town is required to conduct an update pursuant to this section unless the |
27 | state has appropriated sufficient funds to cover the state's costs as identified in subsection (c) of |
28 | this section. |
29 | (g) Any city or town that fails to conduct an update or revaluation as required by this |
30 | section, or requests and receives an extension of the dates specified in this section, shall receive |
31 | the same amount of state aid under sections 45-13-1, 45-13-5.1, and 45-13-12 in the budget year |
32 | for which the new values were to apply as the city or town received in-state aid in the previous |
33 | budget year; provided, however, if the new year's entitlement is lower than the prior year's |
34 | entitlement, the lower amount applies, except for the town of New Shoreham for the fiscal year |
| LC003145 - Page 5 of 7 |
1 | 2003. |
2 | (h) Any bill or resolution to extend the dates for a city or town to conduct an update or |
3 | revaluation must be approved by a two-thirds ( 2/3) (2/3) majority of both houses of the general |
4 | assembly. |
5 | SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage. |
======== | |
LC003145 | |
======== | |
| LC003145 - Page 6 of 7 |
EXPLANATION | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
OF | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO TAXATION -- LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL TAXES | |
*** | |
1 | This act would increase from three (3) to five (5) years the interval of time within which |
2 | a city or town must conduct an update of its last real property revaluation. The five (5) year |
3 | update of real property would not commence prior to the completion of all previously scheduled |
4 | revaluations. |
5 | This act would take effect upon passage. |
======== | |
LC003145 | |
======== | |
| LC003145 - Page 7 of 7 |