2014 -- S 2179 | |
======== | |
LC003612 | |
======== | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2014 | |
____________ | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LAW--GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS | |
| |
Introduced By: Senator Joshua Miller | |
Date Introduced: January 30, 2014 | |
Referred To: Senate Commerce | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
1 | SECTION 1. Title 6 of the General Laws entitled "COMMERCIAL LAW - GENERAL |
2 | REGULATORY PROVISIONS" is hereby amended by adding thereto the following chapter: |
3 | CHAPTER 26.2 |
4 | PREVENTION OF CREDIT CARD COMPANY UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES |
5 | 6-26.2-1. Findings. – (a) Courts have found that Visa and MasterCard and their member |
6 | banks have significant market power. |
7 | (b) Electronic payment system networks set the level of credit and debit card interchange |
8 | fees charged by their member banks even though those banks are supposed to be competitors. |
9 | (c) Competitors should set their own fees and prices and compete on that basis. |
10 | (d) These fees inflate the prices consumers pay for goods and services and often subsidize |
11 | the rewards and benefits of the most affluent cardholders at the expense of less affluent customers |
12 | who do not receive such rewards, or use credit cards at all. |
13 | (e) Consumers are increasingly using credit and debit card electronic payment systems to |
14 | purchase goods and services. |
15 | (f) In order to provide the desired convenience to consumers, most merchants must agree |
16 | to accept credit and debit cards. |
17 | (g) Some electronic payment system networks market themselves as providers of |
18 | currency and promote use of their products as though they were a complete substitution for legal |
19 | tender. |
| |
1 | (h) Due to the market power of the two (2) largest electronic payment system networks, |
2 | merchants do not have the power to negotiate with regards to terms for acceptance of credit and |
3 | debit cards and the cost of the interchange fees for such acceptance. |
4 | (i) Merchants are subject to contracts that allow the electronic payment system networks |
5 | to change the terms without notice, subject merchants to staggering fines, require costly |
6 | operational changes, or changes in the cost of card acceptance. |
7 | (j) Merchants need the flexibility to price their goods and services in accordance with the |
8 | cost of accepting various types of payment. |
9 | 6-26.2-2. Definitions. – As used in this chapter, the following terms have the following |
10 | meanings: |
11 | (1) “Electronic Payment System” means an entity which is not a national bank that |
12 | directly, or through licensed members, processors or agents, provides the proprietary services, |
13 | infrastructure, and software that route information and data to facilitate transaction authorization, |
14 | clearance, and settlement, and that merchants are required to access in order to accept a specific |
15 | brand of general-purpose credit cards, charge cards, debit cards or stored-value cards as payment |
16 | for goods or services. |
17 | (2) “Merchant” means a person or entity doing business in this state which offers goods |
18 | or services for sale in this state. |
19 | 6-26.2-3. Protection of retail competition from credit card company unfair practices. |
20 | – No electronic payment system may, directly or through any agent, processor or member of the |
21 | system: |
22 | (1) Impose any requirement, condition, penalty, or fine in a contract with a merchant |
23 | relating to the display of pricing for goods or services for sale by the merchant. This shall include, |
24 | but not be limited to, a display for a discount to be provided to a consumer for using a form of |
25 | payment that carries lower fees for the merchant; |
26 | (2) Inhibit the ability of any merchant to offer its customers discounts or in-kind |
27 | incentives for using a form of payment (such as cash, check, debit card, or credit card); |
28 | (3) Inhibit the ability of any merchant to offer its customers discounts or in-kind |
29 | incentives for using a debit or credit card of another electronic payment system; |
30 | (4) Prevent any merchant from setting a minimum or maximum dollar value for its |
31 | acceptance of a credit card; |
32 | (5) Inhibit the ability of any merchant to decide not to accept the products of an electronic |
33 | payment system at one of its locations; |
34 | (6) Prevent any merchant from deciding not to accept certain products of an electronic |
| LC003612 - Page 2 of 4 |
1 | payment system based on the fees associated with such products while still accepting other |
2 | products of that electronic payment system; or |
3 | (7) Prevent any merchant from choosing how to route a transaction among any of the |
4 | electronic payment networks authorized to clear transactions on the card in question. |
5 | 6-26.2-4. Prohibition on cartel price-setting by credit card companies. – No |
6 | electronic payment system may set required, suggested, or default rates for the fees to be charged |
7 | by any issuer of its payment cards, agent, processor or member of the system unless such issuer, |
8 | agent or processor is the electronic payment system itself and not a separate legal entity. |
9 | 6-26.2-5. Penalties. – (a) Any electronic payment system found to have violated this |
10 | chapter shall reimburse all affected merchants for all chargebacks, fees, and fines collected from |
11 | affected merchants directly or through any agent, processor or member of the system during the |
12 | period of time in which the electronic payment system was in violation and be liable for a civil |
13 | penalty of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per chargeback, fee or fine levied in violation of this |
14 | chapter. |
15 | (b) Any merchant whose rights under this chapter have been violated may maintain a |
16 | civil action for damages or equitable relief as provided for in this section. |
17 | (c) The attorney general may maintain a civil action for damages or equitable relief as |
18 | provided for in this section to protect against violations of this chapter. |
19 | 6-26.2-6. Severability. -- If any provision of this chapter, or of any rule or regulation |
20 | made under this chapter, or the application of this chapter to any person or circumstance, is held |
21 | invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the chapter, rule, or regulation and |
22 | the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. The |
23 | invalidity of any section or sections or parts of any section or sections of this chapter shall not |
24 | affect the validity of the remainder of the chapter. |
25 | SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage. |
======== | |
LC003612 | |
======== | |
| LC003612 - Page 3 of 4 |
EXPLANATION | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
OF | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO COMMERCIAL LAW--GENERAL REGULATORY PROVISIONS | |
*** | |
1 | This act would establish penalties for unfair practices by electronic payment systems. |
2 | This act would take effect upon passage. |
======== | |
LC003612 | |
======== | |
| LC003612 - Page 4 of 4 |