2017 -- S 0218 | |
======== | |
LC000590 | |
======== | |
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND | |
IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY | |
JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 2017 | |
____________ | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO TAXATION - LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL TAXES | |
| |
Introduced By: Senators P Fogarty, Nesselbush, Archambault, and Pearson | |
Date Introduced: February 02, 2017 | |
Referred To: Senate Housing & Municipal Government | |
It is enacted by the General Assembly as follows: | |
1 | SECTION 1. Sections 44-5-11.5 and 44-5-11.6 of the General Laws in Chapter 44-5 |
2 | entitled "Levy and Assessment of Local Taxes" are hereby amended to read as follows: |
3 | 44-5-11.5. Legislative findings -- Revaluation cycle. |
4 | It is found and declared that: |
5 | (1) Rhode Island property taxes continue to play a significant role in the financing of |
6 | local educational and municipal services. The general assembly recognizes that the way the |
7 | property tax is assessed, levied and collected can be improved to provide more reliable and up-to- |
8 | date property values in each of the cities and towns. |
9 | (2) The state's ten (10) year property revaluation cycle is the longest revaluation cycle in |
10 | the country. Infrequent revaluations translate into disparities in property tax burden between types |
11 | and classes of property within and among cities and towns. In addition, because each city and |
12 | town represents multiple systems and procedures for administering the property tax, there is an |
13 | inconsistent administration of property tax law and regulations. |
14 | (3) It is the intent of the general assembly to ensure that all taxpayers in Rhode Island are |
15 | treated equitably. The more frequent the revaluation, the greater the equity within and among |
16 | jurisdictions. Ensuring that taxpayers are treated fairly begins with modernizing the |
17 | administration of the property tax that ensures: |
18 | (i) Up-to-date property values are maintained through more frequent property |
19 | revaluations; |
| |
1 | (ii) Cities and towns meet defined standards related to performing updates of property |
2 | values; |
3 | (iii) The state shares in the cost of performing updates of property values in the cities and |
4 | towns; |
5 | (iv) A meaningful and effective method of ensuring that cities and towns comply with the |
6 | nine (9) year revaluation cycle and the updates of property values are developed; |
7 | (v) Procedures for administering the property tax are standardized -- such as general |
8 | reporting and classification systems; |
9 | (vi) Assessors and contracted property revaluation companies meet appropriate |
10 | qualifications and standards; and |
11 | (vii) Intergovernmental cooperation in the administration of the property tax is |
12 | maximized. |
13 | (4) With these findings in mind, it is the intent of the general assembly to institute a |
14 | revaluation cycle where every city or town conducts a revaluation within nine (9) years of the |
15 | date of the prior revaluation and shall conduct an update of real property every three (3) years |
16 | from the date of the last revaluation. |
17 | 44-5-11.6. Assessment of valuations -- Apportionment of levies. |
18 | (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 44-5-11 [repealed] beginning on December 31, |
19 | 2000, the assessors in the several towns and cities shall conduct an update as defined in this |
20 | section or shall assess all valuations and apportion the levy of all taxes legally ordered under the |
21 | rules and regulations, not repugnant to law, as the town meetings and city councils, respectively, |
22 | shall, from time to time, prescribe; provided, that the update or valuation is performed in |
23 | accordance with the following schedules: |
24 | (1) (i) For a transition period, for cities and towns that conducted or implemented a |
25 | revaluation as of 1993 or in years later: |
26 | Update Revaluation |
27 | Lincoln 2000 2003 |
28 | South Kingstown 2000 2003 |
29 | Smithfield 2000 2003 |
30 | West Warwick 2000 2003 |
31 | Johnston 2000 2003 |
32 | Burrillville 2000 2003 |
33 | North Smithfield 2000 2003 |
34 | Central Falls 2000 2003 |
| LC000590 - Page 2 of 7 |
1 | North Kingstown 2000 2003 |
2 | Jamestown 2000 2003 |
3 | North Providence 2001 2004 |
4 | Cumberland 2001 2004 |
5 | Bristol 2004 2001 |
6 | Charlestown 2001 2004 |
7 | East Greenwich 2002 2005 |
8 | Cranston 2002 2005 |
9 | Barrington 2002 2005 |
10 | Warwick 2003 2006 |
11 | Warren 2003 2006 |
12 | East Providence 2003 2006 |
13 | (ii) Provided that the reevaluation period for the town of New Shoreham shall be |
14 | extended to 2003 and the update for the town of Hopkinton may be extended to 2007 with no |
15 | additional reimbursements by the state relating to the delay. |
16 | (iii) The implementation date for this schedule is December 31st, of the stated year. |
17 | (iv) Those cities and towns not listed in this schedule shall continue the revaluation |
18 | schedule pursuant to § 44-5-11 [repealed]. |
19 | (2) (i) For the post transition period and in years thereafter: |
20 | Update #1 Update #2 Revaluation |
21 | Woonsocket 2002 2005 2008 |
22 | Pawtucket 2002 2005 2008 |
23 | Portsmouth 2001 2004 2007 |
24 | Coventry 2001 2004 2007 |
25 | Providence 2003 2006 2009 |
26 | Foster 2002 2005 2008 |
27 | Middletown 2002 2005 2008 |
28 | Little Compton 2003 2006 2009 |
29 | Scituate 2003 2006 2009 |
30 | Westerly 2003 2006 2009 |
31 | West Greenwich 2004 2007 2010 |
32 | Glocester 2004 2007 2010 |
33 | Richmond 2004 2007 2010 |
34 | Bristol 2004 2007 2010 |
| LC000590 - Page 3 of 7 |
1 | Tiverton 2005 2008 2011 |
2 | Newport 2005 2008 2011 |
3 | New Shoreham 2006 2009 2012 |
4 | Narragansett 2005 2008 2011 |
5 | Exeter 2005 2008 2011 |
6 | Hopkinton 2007 2010 2013 |
7 | Lincoln 2006 2009 2012 |
8 | South Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 |
9 | Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 |
10 | West Warwick 2006 2009 2012 |
11 | Johnston 2006 2009 2012 |
12 | Burrillville 2006 2009 2012 |
13 | North Smithfield 2006 2009 2012 |
14 | Central Falls 2006 2009 2012 |
15 | North Kingstown 2006 2009 2012 |
16 | Jamestown 2006 2009 2012 |
17 | North Providence 2007 2010 2013 |
18 | Cumberland 2007 2010 2013 |
19 | Charlestown 2007 2010 2013 |
20 | East Greenwich 2008 2011 2014 |
21 | Cranston 2008 2011 2014 |
22 | Barrington 2008 2010 2014 |
23 | Warwick 2009 2012 2015 |
24 | Warren 2009 2012 2016 |
25 | East Providence 2009 2012 2015 |
26 | (ii) The implementation date for the schedule is December 31st of the stated year. Upon |
27 | the completion of the update and revaluation according to this schedule, each city and town shall |
28 | conduct a revaluation within nine (9) years of the date of the prior revaluation and shall conduct |
29 | an update of real property every three (3) six (6) years from the last revaluation. Provided, that for |
30 | the town of Bristol, the time for the first statistical update following the 2010 revaluation shall be |
31 | extended from 2013 to 2014 and said statistical update shall be based on valuations as of |
32 | December 31, 2014, and the first revaluation following the December 31, 2014 and 2015 |
33 | statistical revaluation shall be extended from 2016 to 2019 and said revaluation shall be based on |
34 | valuations as of December 31, 2018. |
| LC000590 - Page 4 of 7 |
1 | (b) No later than February 1, 1998, the director of the department of revenue shall |
2 | promulgate rules and regulations consistent with the provisions of this section to define the |
3 | requirements for the updates that shall include, but not be limited to: |
4 | (1) An analysis of sales; |
5 | (2) A rebuilding of land value tables; |
6 | (3) A rebuilding of cost tables of all improvement items; and |
7 | (4) A rebuilding of depreciation schedules. Upon completion of an update, each city or |
8 | town shall provide for a hearing and/or appeal process for any aggrieved person to address any |
9 | issue that arose during the update. |
10 | (c) The costs incurred by the towns and cities for the first update shall be borne by the |
11 | state in an amount not to exceed twenty dollars ($20.00) per parcel. The costs incurred by the |
12 | towns and cities for the second update shall be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state (in an |
13 | amount not to exceed sixteen dollars ($16.00) per parcel) and twenty percent (20%) by the town |
14 | or city, and in the third update and thereafter, the state shall pay sixty percent (60%) of the update |
15 | (not to exceed twelve dollars ($12.00) per parcel) and the town or city shall pay forty percent |
16 | (40%); provided, that for the second update and in all updates thereafter, that the costs incurred |
17 | by any city or town that is determined to be a distressed community pursuant to § 45-13-12 shall |
18 | be borne eighty percent (80%) by the state and twenty percent (20%) by the city or town for all |
19 | updates required by this section. |
20 | (d) The office of municipal affairs, after consultation with the League of Cities and |
21 | Towns and the Rhode Island Assessors' Association, shall recommend adjustments to the costs |
22 | formula described in subsection (c) of this section based upon existing market conditions. |
23 | (e) Any property that is either exempt from the local property tax pursuant to § 44-3-3 or |
24 | pays a city or town an amount in lieu of taxes is not required to have its values updated pursuant |
25 | to this section and the property is not eligible for the reimbursement provisions of subsection (c) |
26 | of this section. However, those properties that are exempt from taxation and are eligible for state |
27 | appropriations in lieu of property tax under the provisions of § 45-13-5.1 are eligible for state |
28 | reimbursement pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, provided, that these properties were |
29 | revalued as part of that city or town's most recent property revaluation. |
30 | (f) No city or town is required to conduct an update pursuant to this section unless the |
31 | state has appropriated sufficient funds to cover the state's costs as identified in subsection (c) of |
32 | this section. |
33 | (g) Any city or town that fails to conduct an update or revaluation as required by this |
34 | section, or requests and receives an extension of the dates specified in this section, shall receive |
| LC000590 - Page 5 of 7 |
1 | the same amount of state aid under §§ 45-13-1, 45-13-5.1, and 45-13-12 in the budget year for |
2 | which the new values were to apply as the city or town received in-state aid in the previous |
3 | budget year; provided, however, if the new year's entitlement is lower than the prior year's |
4 | entitlement, the lower amount applies, except for the town of New Shoreham for the fiscal year |
5 | 2003. |
6 | (h) Any bill or resolution to extend the dates for a city or town to conduct an update or |
7 | revaluation must be approved by a two-thirds (2/3) majority of both houses of the general |
8 | assembly. |
9 | SECTION 2. This act shall take effect upon passage. |
======== | |
LC000590 | |
======== | |
| LC000590 - Page 6 of 7 |
EXPLANATION | |
BY THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL | |
OF | |
A N A C T | |
RELATING TO TAXATION - LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL TAXES | |
*** | |
1 | This act would increase from three (3) to six (6) years the interval of time within which a |
2 | city or town must conduct an update of its last real property revaluation. |
3 | This act would take effect upon passage. |
======== | |
LC000590 | |
======== | |
| LC000590 - Page 7 of 7 |